Marketingfilmer

@hungsolow123 wow, no offense but saying marketing adds nothing of value is rather ignorant, marketing is ALL about adding value! why do u pick already squeezed and bits-removed OJ from ur supermarket everyday instead of oranges from the farmer’s market? its marketing!

same goes with farmer’s market potatoes vs cleaned/bagged potatoes… people always vote yes to the value marketing adds everyday with their hard-earned money buying packaged potatoes in this example…

@nothingnesswithouten Precisely.. what utter nonsense this is.

@dukestt …two lighters a day, that is a heavy smoker.

@egdapo Consumer Reports consistently rates Dyson vacuums well. They also consistently rate Dyson vacuums behind just about every other major brand, partially because Dysons tend to run 4-10x the price.

There’s nothing WRONG with a Dyson vacuum. There’s just nothing it can do that a good Eureka or Hoover can’t.

First he says that it needs a lot of force to change the position of a big brand and then he disproves his own statement with the BP example…… well seems like in his world the laws of physic are more like guidelines than actual rules…..

There’s something I can’t agree, but it’s a interesting way of thinking on the whole.

@nothingnesswithouten you summed up what i was thinking beautifully

@okonomiyaki4U i thought it was obvious that he meant a positive change. durrrr

@hcortens aw shucks thanks!

everyone knew about this.. duh

=[ That’s not the uncertainty principal. The uncertainty principal is that some pairs of variables in QM are such that precise measurement of one precludes precise measurement of the other. It was in the equation! What he described is the observer paradox I think.

rofl… this is a farce